Beautiful Stories From Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet

E. Nesbit offers this adaptation of the famous play, Romeo, and Juliet by William Shakespeare. Overview of the Montagu and Capulet Families Once upon a time there lived in Verona two great families named Montagu and Capulet. They were both rich, and we  suppose they were as sensible, in most things, as other rich people. But for one thing, they were extremely silly. There was an old, old quarrel between the two families, and instead of making it up like reasonable folks, they made a sort of pet of their quarrel, and would not let it die out. So that a Montagu wouldnt speak to a Capulet if he met one in the street—nor a Capulet to a Montagu—or if they did speak, it was to say rude and unpleasant things, which often ended in a fight. And their relations and servants were just as foolish, so that street fights and duels and uncomfortableness of that kind were always growing out of the Montagu-and-Capulet quarrel. Lord Capulets Grand Supper and Dance Now Lord Capulet, the head of that family, gave a party—a grand supper and a dance—and he was so hospitable that he said anyone might come to it except (of course) the Montagues. But there was a young Montagu named Romeo, who very much wanted to be there, because Rosaline, the lady he loved, had been asked. This lady had never been at all kind to him, and he had no reason to love her; but the fact was that he wanted to love somebody, and as he hadnt seen the right lady, he was obliged to love the wrong one. So to the Capulets grand party, he came, with his friends Mercutio and Benvolio. Old Capulet welcomed him and his two friends very kindly—and young Romeo moved about among the crowd of courtly folk dressed in their velvets and satins, the men with jeweled sword hilts and collars, and the ladies with brilliant gems on breast and arms, and stones of price set in their bright girdles. Romeo was in his best too, and though he wore a black mask over his eyes and nose, everyone could see by his mouth and his hair, and the way he held his head, that he was twelve times more handsome than anyone else in the room. When Romeo LaidEyes on Juliet Amid the dancers, he saw a lady so beautiful and so lovable that from that moment he never again gave one thought to that Rosaline whom he had thought he loved. And he looked at this other fair lady, as she moved in the dance in her white satin and pearls, and all the world seemed vain and worthless to him compared with her. And he was saying this, or something like it, when Tybalt, Lady Capulets nephew, hearing his voice, knew him to be Romeo. Tybalt, being very angry, went at once to his uncle, and told him how a Montagu had come uninvited to the feast; but old Capulet was too fine a gentleman to be discourteous to any man under his own roof, and he bade Tybalt be quiet. But this young man only waited for a chance to quarrel with Romeo. In the meantime, Romeo made his way to the fair lady, and told her in sweet words that he loved her, and kissed her. Just then her mother sent for her, and then Romeo found out that the lady on whom he had set his hearts hopes was Juliet, the daughter of Lord Capulet, his sworn foe. So he went away, sorrowing indeed, but loving her none the less. Then Juliet said to her nurse: Who is that gentleman that would not dance? His name is Romeo, and a Montagu, the only son of your great enemy, answered the nurse. The Balcony Scene Then Juliet went to her room, and looked out of her window, over the beautiful green-grey garden, where the moon was shining. And Romeo was hidden in that garden among the trees—because he could not bear to go right away without trying to see her again. So she—not knowing him to be there--spoke her secret thought aloud, and told the quiet garden how she loved Romeo. And Romeo heard and was glad beyond measure. Hidden below, he looked up and saw her fair face in the moonlight, framed in the blossoming creepers that grew round her window, and as he looked and listened, he felt as though he had been carried away in a dream, and set down by some magician in that beautiful and enchanted garden. Ah—why are you called Romeo? said Juliet. Since I love you, what does it matter what you are called? Call me but love, and Ill be new baptized—henceforth I never will be Romeo, he cried, stepping into the full white moonlight from the shade of the cypresses and oleanders that had hidden him. She was frightened at first, but when she saw that it was Romeo himself, and no stranger, she too was glad, and, he standing in the garden below and she leaning from the window, they spoke long together, each one trying to find the sweetest words in the world, to make that pleasant talk that lovers use. And the tale of all they said, and the sweet music their voices made together, is all set down in a golden book, where your children may read it for yourselves some day. And the time passed so quickly, as it does for folk who love each other and are together, that when the time came to part, it seemed as though they had met but that moment—and indeed they hardly knew how to part. I will send to you to-morrow, said Juliet. And so at last, with lingering and longing, they said good-bye. Juliet went into her room, and a dark curtain bid her bright window. Romeo went away through the still and dewy garden like a man in a dream. The Marriage The next morning, very early, Romeo went to Friar Laurence, a priest, and, telling him all the story, begged him to marry him to Juliet without delay. And this, after some talk, the priest consented to do. So when Juliet sent her old nurse to Romeo that day to know what he purposed to do, the old woman took back a message that all was well, and all things ready for the marriage of Juliet and Romeo on the next morning. The young lovers were afraid to ask their parents consent to their marriage, as young people should do, because of this foolish old quarrel between the Capulets and the Montagues. And Friar Laurence was willing to help the young lovers secretly because he thought that when they were once married their parents might soon be told, and that the match might put a happy end to the old quarrel. So the next morning early, Romeo and Juliet were married at Friar Laurences cell and parted with tears and kisses. And Romeo promised to come into the garden that evening, and the nurse got ready a rope-ladder to let down from the window so that Romeo could climb up and talk to his dear wife quietly and alone. But that very day a dreadful thing happened. The Death of Tybalt, Juliets Cousin Tybalt, the young man who had been so vexed at Romeos going to the Capulets feast, met him and his two friends, Mercutio and Benvolio, in the street, called Romeo a villain and asked him to fight. Romeo had no wish to fight with Juliets cousin, but Mercutio drew his sword, and he and Tybalt fought. And Mercutio was killed. When Romeo saw that this friend was dead, he forgot everything except anger at the man who had killed him, and he and Tybalt fought till Tybalt fell dead. Romeos Banishment So, on the very day of his wedding, Romeo killed his dear Juliets cousin and was sentenced to be banished. Poor Juliet and her young husband met that night indeed; he climbed the rope-ladder among the flowers and found her window, but their meeting was a sad one, and they parted with bitter tears and hearts heavy because they could not know when they should meet again. Now Juliets father, who, of course, had no idea that she was married, wished her to wed a gentleman named Paris and was so angry when she refused, that she hurried away to ask Friar Laurence what she should do. He advised her to pretend to consent, and then he said: I will give you a draught that will make you seem to be dead for two days, and then when they take you to church it will be to bury you, and not to marry you. They will put you in the vault thinking you are dead, and before you wake up Romeo and I will be there to take care of you. Will you do this, or are you afraid? I will do it; talk not to me of fear! said Juliet. And she went home and told her father she would marry Paris. If she had spoken out and told her father the truth . . . well, then this would have been a different story. Lord Capulet was very much pleased to get his own way, and set about inviting his friends and getting the wedding feast ready. Everyone stayed up all night, for there was a great deal to do and very little time to do it in. Lord Capulet was anxious to get Juliet married because he saw she was very unhappy. Of course, she was really fretting about her husband Romeo, but her father thought she was grieving for the death of her cousin Tybalt, and he thought marriage would give her something else to think about. The Tragedy Early in the morning, the nurse came to call Juliet, and to dress her for her wedding; but she would not wake, and at last the nurse cried out suddenly—Alas! alas! help! help! my ladys dead! Oh, well-a-day that ever I was born! Lady Capulet came running in, and then Lord Capulet, and Lord Paris, the bridegroom. There lay Juliet cold and white and lifeless, and all their weeping could not wake her. So it was a burying that day instead of a marrying. Meantime Friar Laurence had sent a messenger to Mantua with a letter to Romeo telling him of all these things; and all would have been well, only the messenger was delayed, and could not go. But ill news travels fast. Romeos servant who knew the secret of the marriage, but not of Juliets pretended death, heard of her funeral and hurried to Mantua to tell Romeo how his young wife was dead and lying in the grave. Is it so? cried Romeo, heart-broken. Then I will lie by Juliets side to-night. And he bought himself a poison and went straight back to Verona. He hastened to the tomb where Juliet was lying. It was not a grave, but a vault. He broke open the door and was just going down the stone steps that led to the vault where all the dead Capulets lay when he heard a voice behind him calling on him to stop. It was Count Paris, who was to have married Juliet that very day. How dare you come here and disturb the dead bodies of the Capulets, you vile Montagu? cried Paris. Poor Romeo, half mad with sorrow, yet tried to answer gently. You were told, said Paris, that if you returned to Verona you must die. I must indeed, said Romeo. I came here for nothing else. Good, gentle youth—leave me! Oh, go—before I do you any harm! I love you better than myself—go--leave me here— Then Paris said, I defy you, and I arrest you as a felon, and Romeo, in his anger and despair, drew his sword. They fought, and Paris was killed. As Romeos sword pierced him, Paris cried—Oh, I am slain! If thou be merciful, open the tomb, and lay me with Juliet! And Romeo said, In faith, I will. And he carried the dead man into the tomb and laid him by the dear Juliets side. Then he kneeled by Juliet and spoke to her, and held her in his arms, and kissed her cold lips, believing that she was dead, while all the while she was coming nearer and nearer to the time of her awakening. Then he drank the poison and died beside his sweetheart and wife. Now came Friar Laurence when it was too late, and saw all that had happened--and then poor Juliet woke out of her sleep to find her husband and her friend both dead beside her. The noise of the fight had brought other folks to the place too, and Friar Laurence, hearing them, ran away, and Juliet was left alone. She saw the cup that had held the poison and knew how all had happened, and since no poison was left for her, she drew her Romeos dagger and thrust it through her heart--and so, falling with her head on her Romeos breast, she died. And here ends the story of these faithful and most unhappy lovers. * * * * * * * And when the old folks knew from Friar Laurence of all that had befallen, they sorrowed exceedingly, and now, seeing all the mischief their wicked quarrel had wrought, they repented them of it, and over the bodies of their dead children, they clasped hands at last, in friendship and forgiveness.

Both Mary Shelleys ÂFrankenstein and Bram Stokers...

Both Mary Shelleys ‘Frankenstein and Bram Stokers ‘Dracula are concerned with representations of evil. Which creation/character do you find most frightening and why? Evil features in both ‘Dracula and ‘Frankenstein but the personification of this evil is different in both novels. A feeling of menace and doom pervades ‘Dracula because of his supernatural powers. One feels that he has control of the evil and he has the power to manipulate the environment and people for his own ends. ‘Frankenstein centres on the creation of a monster made from parts of dead bodies and the fear created by the monster due to circumstance and the ignorance of society. Also, one feels a certain amount of apprehension that the monster is deserted by†¦show more content†¦Mina realises this and pleads with the men to not tell her anything that might give their plans away. I found Dracula particularly vivid in detail, this contributed to making the novel more frightening, the horror and blood-filled images were described so brilliantly that I could not help but imagine them. Her white night-dress was smeared with blood, and a thin stream trickled down the mans bare breast, which was shown by his torn open dress. The attitude of the two had a terrible resemblance to a child forcing a kittens nose into a saucer of milk to compel it to drink. This horrifying scene continues, His eyes flamed red with devilish passion, his aquiline nose opened wide and quivered at the edges; and the white sharp teeth, behind the full lips of the blood-dripping mouth, champed together like those of a wild beast. In ‘Frankenstein the monster does not wish to spill blood and uses strangulation as his only method of killing, the murder scenes are not described in as much horrific detail and this leads to a less frightening view of the novel. To me, Dracula is a corrupt person, devoid of any human feelings, he does not wish to and cannot feel compassion for any other living soul, he is completely self-involved and lives a solitary life, the only companions of his kind are the three female vampires. The difference with Frankensteins monster is that he is a creature corrupted by

Digital Piracy free essay sample

Music Industry Imagine hearing your favorite bands new song on the radio for the first time. You love it, and the moment you get home you head straight for your computer and find the song on Tunes. Upset with the fact that you would have to pay $1. 29 for the song, you search the Internet and find one of the many digital piracy websites and download the song illegally. Sure, you may have obtained the song for free, but you have also Just stolen from your favorite band. Growing up surrounded by music and Ewing an aspiring musician myself, I quickly developed a great appreciation for the art. Because my father Is a business manager for several bands, I went to quite a few concerts in my childhood: watching the artists perform on stage commanded my love and respect for what they were doing. As a true fan of the art of music, I was both shocked and disappointed when I learned that people were cheating the hard- working musicians by Illegally downloading music via the Internet. Musicians work long hours and spend thousands of dollars writing, recording, and producing their USIA so stealing from them is no different from stealing from any store.Digital piracy is unethical because not only is the practice against the law, but it also has negative repercussions on the music Industry as it yields little financial return to musicians and depicts a negative shift in consumer traditions. One of the biggest issues today with digital piracy, according to Poll Guppy, professor of marketing at Wright State university in Dayton, Ohio, is that people feel less guilty stealing from Impersonal and invisible others than they do from visible persons (Guppy 258).Many people dont view illegal downloading as stealing because they are not physically taking something from someone else they are simply downloading a file from the Internet, invisible to both the musicians and authorities. Globally, 10. 6 million songs are downloaded illegally every hour (Guppy 264). Due to the millions of people worldwide stealing music every day, the music Industry has been In a constant period of regression for the past TV. 0 decades.According to the manager of world- renowned rock band 02, Paul Mugginess, digital piracy is degrading the music industry 5% of music obtained around the world is downloaded illegally and unpaid for (Mugginess). Because downloading music online for free has become so easy, people are no longer buying albums; instead, they only download the songs they want. This has shot down the profits of all musicians, as they no longer can rely on selling records to make money.Although digital piracy is not crippling highly successful bands, such as 02, young, developing artists are struggling to get started and malting enough funds to continue making music. As Mugginess points out, today, control over their work is exactly what young bands are losing. Its not their fault. It is because of piracy and the way the Internet has devalued their work (Mugginess). It Is becoming harder and harder for bands to sign with record companies because the record labels do not want to Invest money In bands that arena going to produce profits. Because fewer bands are getting record labels and already established bands arent selling as many albums, musicians are losing money I OFF seventies, eighties, and nineties produced at least ten albums in their careers; today, the most successful artists produce no more than four or five albums (Nipper 45). This is causing record stores all around the country to lose money, go out of business, and shut down. According to Steve Nipper, a regular contributor to Rolling Stone magazine, nearly three quarters of all independent music shops have shut down in the last decade Only thirteen percent of people buy CDC from record stores now (Nipper 45). With fewer people buying albums, record labels have even less incentive to give bands money to make CDC. Not are record labels hesitant to produce albums, but the artists also have less incentive to put in the time and effort to make albums. Some bands take years to put together albums and spend most of their money doing so (Mugginess). With only thirteen percent of people buying albums these days, many musicians believe the costs of making a new CD significantly outweigh the benefits.One of the major consequences of decreased record sales is an increase in the prices of concert tickets and merchandise. In order to make up for the loss of profits surrounding album sales, musicians are forced to increase tour duration and/or Jack up the prices of their concert tickets and merchandise. Since touring is very time consuming and exhausting, most musicians apt to simply raise their prices something that concert goers are increasingly unhappy about. It is these same people, statistically and ironically, that are illegally downloading the artists music and causing them to raise the prices. Ethics have become seemingly inexistent in our culture today it is no surprise that the same people that complain about the prices of music and concerts and merchandise also actively participate in digital music piracy (Guppy 272). This lack of ethics pointed out by Dry. Guppy depicts a negative shift in consumer traditions, stemming from legally downloading music. People in our society take for granted things such as music a business that is not often thought of as a business.For example, someone may think he or she is a die-hard supporter of his or her favorite band, listening to the artists music or hanging up concert posters, but that same person might also download all of their music illegally. Without monetary support, businesses like the music industry cannot survive. Everything musicians do, from putting out albums to going on tour, is for the public. Everyone has the liberty to enjoy music, but many people believe they can free ride to have this liberty.If people continue to take advantage of and exploit the music industry, eventually there will be no more music (Mugginess). It is widely accepted in the media world that any publicity is good publicity; for this reason, many people argue that although digital piracy is leading to a loss of revenue for bands, it is actually beneficial to them because more people listen to their music and become supportive fans. With this additional publicity, bands are able to sell more tickets to their concerts and in the long run make up for cost revenue from album sales.Despite the validity of this argument, stealing is still stealing and is against the law. Not caring about stealing or breaking laws represents a negative change in consumer traditions we have been experiencing over the last decade or two. It starts with digital piracy, but who knows where it will go next? With the Internet rap idly expanding, it is only a matter of time before all digitized merchandise can and will be stolen. In addition, even if bands can make up material to tour on without the short-term financial return an album can provide.Roughly half of a bands profit will come from record sales, and, as a business, a band cannot survive with the loss of these profits, no matter the circumstances :Mugginess). Every choice comes with a consequence, whether its eating that last piece of pie or studying all day to secure a good grade. Knowing the potential consequences of a choice often plays a large role in the eventual decision. 7. 7 million people each year choose to download music illegally, habitually and without paying any attention to the consequences (Guppy 264). If this continues, the music industryNail keep disintegrating until there is nothing left of it. Only the consumer can implement the changes necessary to reverse the current trends of the declination of the music industry. Will you be one of the 7. 7 million? Or will you have the initiative for change? The future of your favorite bands has a grim outlook; stop stealing from them so they can continue to make music and the music industry can once again thrive. Eliminating illegal downloading will recharge the music industry and may determine whether that favorite band was ever discovered in the first place.

Mejia Frank Essays - Human Sexuality, Gender, Human Behavior

Mejia Frank Myers En g 1A July 5 th 2018 Green, Richard MD . "Gender Identity in childhood and later sexual orientation follow-up of 78 males" Am J Psychiatry. March 1985 . Richard Green is an American sexologist , psychiatrist , and author specializing in homosexuality, specifically gender identity disorder in children . Green is the founding editor of the Archives of Sexual Behavior in 1971, and served as Editor until 2001 in New York city . He is also the founding president of the International Academy of Sex Research 1975 , which made the its official publication. Richard Green M.D made a study in the year of 1985 with two groups of males that were evaluated on on sexual orientation identity in three sta ges initially boyhood and late adolescence lastly early adulthood. The group was composed of 66 boys that volunteered and 56 that clinically tested in for for sexual orientation prognosis. At the end of his prognosis he wanted to see how many of the boys who came in were gay and how many weren't but over time making visual observations for each boy and trying to come to a conclus ion of which boy might be gay without any interactions. D uring his observations he wanted to see how many boys might be gay by just observing them. And see if they did turn out gay by his observations he concluded that there was no real way o f telling do to the fact that every boy was nurtured differently their for making his observations inconclusive. While reading the article I found out that Richard Green was founding editor of Archives of Sexual Behavior in 1971, serving as Editor for 30 years. In 1974 Green and the board of the new journal established the International Academy of Sex Research , with Green as the founding president; the Archives became the official publication of the Academy which would have made him one of the most qualified authors . On my subject he left out any bias because he was one of the first activist for sexual orientation and came it the topic with an open mind . At first Richard green was aim ing this for doctors all over the world but then when he went public he wanted to reach out to the general public. How this adds to my research would be he has emphasis on the fact that no matter how much research you do that no one person is the same do the fact that every boy and girl is nurtured very differently and that affects the outcome in which the boy's mindset starts realizing their sexual orientation. The way I can compare this to my other ar ticles would go as follows Richard Green emphasis on the nature part of sexual orientation just like Elizabeth M Morgan on identity development.

Personal Opinion of Human Psychology and Dr Buscaglia essays

Personal Opinion of Human Psychology and Dr Buscaglia essays The questions posed to me are what I think of Human Psychology and the views of Dr. Buscaglia. My answers are no where near as easy as the questions. I don't know very much about Human Psychology, but from what I do know I think it is a great way to learn about people. I feel this way because I believe the self is a very important part of life. Dealing with a persons troubles in a conscious way will help them learn to deal with it on their own. On the later subject I am very well informed. I saw this video once in High School and it still gives me goose bumps. I do agree with Dr. Buscaglia on his views. His ideas sound wonderful, but we must be realistic. Our world doesn't work that way. Some people are really nice and do care, but others love pity. They play on others to build themselves up. Love is a gift and should be cherished, but I do believe that it would take ages to create the kind of love he is talking about. It is a very slim chance that it will ever happen. If you look, throughout history, as long as there have been people there has been hate. Those rotten few have and will always ruin it for the rest. It is not their fault, not their parent, grandparent and so on. Its human nature to hate crave greed lust and other such sins. We dont mean to be like that its just the way we are. There is no good without evil, no light without dark, and no love without . If our species accepts that, we might be able to get a foothold on true love. ...

Why You Shouldnt Trust Homeschooling Statistics

Why You Shouldn't Trust Homeschooling Statistics When arguing the pros and cons of any issue, its usually helpful to have agreed-upon facts on hand. Unfortunately, when it comes to homeschooling, there are very few reliable studies and statistics available. Even something as basic as how many children are being homeschooled in a given year can only be guessed at. Here are a few of the reasons you should take any facts and figures you see regarding homeschooling - good or bad - with a grain of salt. The Definition of Homeschooling Differs Would you consider all these children homeschoolers? A child enrolled in a virtual public charter school who does all schoolwork at home.A child who spends part of the week in public school classes.A child who homeschooled some years but not others. When it comes to counting heads and drawing conclusions, its important to compare apples with apples. But since different studies use different definitions of homeschooling, its hard to know if studies are actually looking at the same group of kids. For instance, a report from the National Center for Education Studies, part of the U.S. Department of Education, includes students who spend up to 25 hours a week - five hours a day - attending classes in a public or private school. Its hard to equate that experience to that of a child who has never sat in a classroom. States Dont Keep Complete Records of Who Homeschools In the U.S., it is the states that oversee education, including homeschooling. And each states laws on the matter are different. In some states, parents are free to homeschool without even contacting the local school district. In other states, parents must send a Letter of Intent to homeschool and submit regular paperwork, which can include the scores of standardized tests. But even in states where homeschooling is closely regulated, good numbers are hard to come by. In New York, for example, parents must submit paperwork to the school district - but only for children within the age of compulsory education. Below the age of six, or after age 16, the state stops keeping count. So its impossible to know from state records how many families choose to homeschool kindergarten, or how many teens go on from homeschooling to college. Widely-Quoted Studies Are Biased Its hard to find an article about homeschool in the national media that does not include a quote from the Home School Legal Defense Association. HSLDA is a nonprofit homeschool advocacy group that offers legal representation to members in some cases involving homeschooling. HSLDA also lobbies state and national legislatures to present its conservative Christian viewpoint on issues regarding home education and family rights. So its fair to question whether HSLDAs studies represent only its constituents and not homeschoolers from other walks of life. Likewise, it seems reasonable to expect that studies by groups in favor of or opposed to homeschooling will reflect those biases. So its not surprising that the National Home Education Research Institute, an advocacy group, publishes studies that show the benefits of homeschooling. Teachers groups like the National Education Association on the other hand, often release statements criticizing homeschooling simply on the basis that it does not require parents to be licensed teachers. Many Homeschooling Families Choose Not to Take Part in Studies In 1991, Home Education Magazine ran a column by Larry and Susan Kaseman which advised parents to avoid taking part in studies about homeschooling. They argued that researchers could use their school-based biases to misrepresent the way that homeschooling works. For instance, a question about how many hours are spent teaching implies that parents should be sitting down with their kids doing desk work, and ignores the fact that a lot of learning happens in the course of everyday activities. The HEM article went on to say that academics who conduct studies often come to be regarded as experts on homeschooling, by the public and sometimes by homeschooling parents themselves. Their fear was that homeschooling would come to be defined by the measures looked at in the studies. Along with the issues raised by the Kasemans, many homeschooling families dont take part in studies to preserve their privacy. Theyd simply rather stay under the radar, and not risk being judged by people who might disagree with their educational choices. Interestingly, the HEM article came out in favor of case histories. According to the Kasemans, interviewing individual homeschooling families to hear what they have to say about their educational styles is a more effective and accurate way to provide data on what homeschooling is really like. Many Scholarly Studies Are Stacked Against Homeschooling Its easy to say that most homeschooling families are not qualified to educate their own children - if you define qualified to mean certified to teach in a public school. But could a medical doctor teach her children anatomy? Of course. Could a published poet teach a homeschool workshop on creative writing? Who better? How about learning bike repair by helping out in a bike shop? The apprenticeship model worked for centuries. Measures of public school success like test scores are often meaningless in the real world, as well as in homeschooling. Thats why demands that homeschoolers submit to more testing and studies that look at homeschooling through the lens of traditional schooling can miss the true advantages of learning outside a classroom. Homeschool Research to Take With a Grain of Salt Here are some links to research on homeschooling, from a variety of sources. Number of Homeschoolers by State: Updated listings by Ann Zeise from A2Z Homes Cool.The International Center for Home Education Research: Formed in 2012, this group says it provides nonpartisan information about homeschooling.Education Week Homeschooling article: Overview from 2011 with links to related articles and studies.New Nationwide Study Confirms Homeschool Academic Achievement: HSLDA article with links to studies.1.5 Million Homeschooled Students in the United States in 2007: Article from the National Center for Education Studies.What Have We Learned About Homeschooling?: Article by E. Isenberg from the Peabody Journal of Education, 2007, that discusses the lack of reliable data on homeschooling.Home Schooling in the United States: Trends and Characteristics: Study by K. Bauman published in Education Policy Analysis Archives in 2002, using data from the 1990s.

The Human Rights Act and life sentence prisoners Essay

The Human Rights Act and life sentence prisoners - Essay Example There was a powerful presumption against the retrospective application of the Act, and in relation to transactions that had taken place prior to the coming into force of the Act; there could be no question of interpretation under s 3 and accordingly no power to grant a declaration under s 4. 1 (Human Rights, Article 7) Three decisions of the House can be cited to illustrate the strength of the interpretative obligation under section 3(1). The first is R v A (No. 2) [2002] 1 AC 45 which concerned the so-called rape shield legislation. The problem was the blanket exclusion of prior sexual history between the complainant and an accused in section 41(1) of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, subject to narrow specific categories in the remainder of section 41. In subsequent decisions, and in academic literature, there has been discussion about differences of emphasis in the various opinions in A. What has been largely overlooked is the unanimous conclusion of the House. The House unanimously agreed on an interpretation under section 3 which would ensure that section 41 would be compatible with the ECHR. The formulation was by agreement set out in paragraph 46 of Lord Steyn's opinion in that case as follows: "The effect of the decision today is that ... o the importance of seeking to protect the complainant from indignity and from humiliating questions, the test of admissibility is whether the evidence (and questioning in relation to it) is nevertheless so relevant to the issue of consent that to exclude it would endanger the fairness of the trial under article 6 of the Convention. If this test is satisfied the evidence should not be excluded." (Lord Steyn, 2006a) Case: Re S Care plan 2002 UKHL 10 House of Lords and Starred Care Plans Re S (Minors) 3 The House of Lords did not uphold the Court of Appeals creation of starred care plans, a bold attempt to devise a way for care plans which were not being implemented coming back to court; instead they stressed the need for the government to urgently review this - power of section 3 HRA limited, court must be mindful of outer limit. Interpretation up to courts but enactment and amendment matter for Parliament - starred milestones departed substantially from Parliamentary intentions so far as it is possible to do so, primary legislation must be read and given effect in a way which is compatible with convention rights . (Child adoption) Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead 4 The Torbay case: The appeals concern four children, two in the Torbay case and two in the Bedfordshire case. The cases are factually unrelated. In the Torbay case the mother had three children: P, who is a boy born in August 1987, M, a boy born in January 1991, and J, a girl born in January 1992. The children are now 14, 11 and 10 years old. The appeal concerns the two younger children. The father of P, the eldest child, played no part in these proceedings. The mother met the father of M and J in 1987. They started to cohabit in 1989. Serious problems emerged in May 1999 when P ran away from home and